AFIF vs. PRXV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

AFIF vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFIF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 3.54%
• 10Y*: —

PRXV

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIF vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	0.53%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIF and PRXV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	0.42

Return for Risk

AFIF vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF

AFIF Risk / Return Rank: 63
AFIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AFIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AFIF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AFIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AFIF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIF vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFIF	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFIF	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	4.54	-4.12

Drawdowns

AFIF vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFIF	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-1.18%	-9.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.03%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-0.32%	-1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFIF	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76%	9.66%	-6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.44%	9.66%	-5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.27%	9.66%	-3.39%

AFIF vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFIF vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	3.58%	3.52%	5.61%	5.91%	3.49%	1.73%	1.25%	2.54%	0.69%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFIF and PRXV in my portfolio?

AFIF and PRXV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AFIF or PRXV?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFIF or PRXV?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFIF or PRXV?

AFIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

What is the main difference between AFIF and PRXV?

AFIF is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.36% for PRXV.