AFIF vs. PRAB
AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and PRAB (State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRAB.
Performance
AFIF vs. PRAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFIF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
PRAB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFIF vs. PRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 1.36% |
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFIF and PRAB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFIF vs. PRAB — Risk / Return Rank
AFIF
PRAB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFIF vs. PRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFIF | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFIF vs. PRAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than PRAB's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and PRAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFIF | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -0.48% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -0.08% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
AFIF vs. PRAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFIF | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75% | 1.12% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 1.12% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 1.12% | +5.10% |
AFIF vs. PRAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFIF vs. PRAB - Dividend Comparison
AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than PRAB's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.72% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFIF and PRAB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.
AFIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.48% for PRAB.
They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.39% for PRAB.
Find the right allocation for AFIF and PRAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer