AFIF vs. BLUI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLUI.

Performance

AFIF vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIF achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 3.27% return.

AFIF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 3.54%
• 10Y*: —

BLUI

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIF vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	1.38%	3.47%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	3.27%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIF and BLUI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.44

AFIF vs. BLUI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AFIF	BLUI
Energy	100.0%	46.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	51.0%
Technology	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

AFIF vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF

AFIF Risk / Return Rank: 63
AFIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AFIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AFIF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AFIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AFIF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIF vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFIF	BLUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFIF	BLUI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.97	-1.55

Drawdowns

AFIF vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than BLUI's maximum drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and BLUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFIF	BLUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-2.43%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.43%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-0.37%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFIF	BLUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76%	3.89%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.44%	3.89%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.27%	3.89%	+2.38%

AFIF vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFIF vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than BLUI's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	3.58%	3.52%	5.61%	5.91%	3.49%	1.73%	1.25%	2.54%	0.69%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	4.72%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFIF and BLUI in my portfolio?

AFIF and BLUI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AFIF or BLUI?

On fees, BLUI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFIF or BLUI?

BLUI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFIF or BLUI?

BLUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.58% for AFIF.

What is the main difference between AFIF and BLUI?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.75% for BLUI.