PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFGPX vs. JIJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFGPX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than JIJIX's 26.05% return.


AFGPX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.72%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.22%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
7.98%

JIJIX

1D
0.92%
1M
8.42%
YTD
26.05%
6M
28.44%
1Y
39.30%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFGPX
Alger International Focus Fund
10.64%18.22%5.20%18.03%-31.00%9.09%43.38%12.23%
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
26.05%23.10%24.88%18.92%-31.47%17.94%36.58%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AFGPX and JIJIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.90

The correlation between AFGPX and JIJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFGPX vs. JIJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFGPX
AFGPX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AFGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AFGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

JIJIX
JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFGPXJIJIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.68

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

2.33

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.43

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

9.53

-5.60

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFGPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the JIJIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFGPX and JIJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFGPXJIJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.68

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.54

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.74

-0.28

Drawdowns

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFGPX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than JIJIX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGPX and JIJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFGPXJIJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-41.80%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-16.01%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-18.04%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.17%

-41.80%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-11.43%

-7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.08%

-0.46%

Volatility

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) is 6.83%, while John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that AFGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFGPXJIJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

9.86%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

20.60%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

23.25%

-4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

20.48%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

22.11%

-2.49%

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFGPX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than JIJIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFGPX vs. JIJIX - Dividend Comparison

AFGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than JIJIX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AFGPX
Alger International Focus Fund
12.48%13.81%6.27%0.00%0.00%10.04%0.00%4.42%2.96%5.26%1.26%
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
2.33%2.94%0.13%0.22%0.79%30.17%5.62%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AFGPX and JIJIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIJIX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to AFGPX (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFGPX dropped -63.63% vs JIJIX's -41.80%.

JIJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFGPX and JIJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer