AFGPX vs. FACNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFGPX (Alger International Focus Fund) and FACNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AFGPX returned 7.98%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for FACNX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFGPX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for FACNX.

Performance

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFGPX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than FACNX's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AFGPX has underperformed FACNX with an annualized return of 7.98%, while FACNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.

AFGPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 11.22%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 7.98%

FACNX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFGPX Alger International Focus Fund	10.64%	18.22%	5.20%	18.03%	-31.00%	9.09%	43.38%	27.60%	-21.49%	25.80%
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	7.83%	25.49%	8.83%	14.33%	-6.44%	26.44%	4.11%	25.42%	-14.59%	12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AFGPX and FACNX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.73

The correlation between AFGPX and FACNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AFGPX vs. FACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFGPX

AFGPX Risk / Return Rank: 11
AFGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AFGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
AFGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
AFGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
AFGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FACNX

FACNX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFGPX	FACNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.47	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.03	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	2.41	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	7.97	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFGPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFGPX and FACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFGPX	FACNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	1.47	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.65	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.58	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.28	+0.18

Drawdowns

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFGPX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than FACNX's maximum drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGPX and FACNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFGPX	FACNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-58.18%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.92%	-7.63%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.34%	-12.16%	-3.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.17%	-21.12%	-21.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.17%	-39.88%	-2.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.42%	-12.17%	-7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.31%	+1.31%

Volatility

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Volatility Comparison

Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) at 2.77%. This indicates that AFGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFGPX	FACNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	2.77%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.10%	9.87%	+6.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.83%	12.54%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	15.96%	+4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	17.43%	+2.19%

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFGPX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FACNX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFGPX vs. FACNX - Dividend Comparison

AFGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than FACNX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFGPX Alger International Focus Fund	12.48%	13.81%	6.27%	0.00%	0.00%	10.04%	0.00%	4.42%	2.96%	5.26%	1.26%	0.00%
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	5.02%	5.41%	7.14%	3.06%	3.79%	4.86%	2.28%	4.13%	6.91%	0.89%	1.31%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFGPX and FACNX in my portfolio?

AFGPX and FACNX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFGPX or FACNX?

AFGPX has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to FACNX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFGPX dropped -63.63% vs FACNX's -58.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FACNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.