PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFB vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFB vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFB achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than NMTRX's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AFB has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.60%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.


AFB

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.72%
YTD
6.20%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-1.26%
10Y*
1.60%

NMTRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFB vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
6.20%4.41%4.10%7.41%-25.93%7.25%7.80%20.13%-5.43%6.15%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.47%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AFB and NMTRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.28

The correlation between AFB and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFB vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFB
AFB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFB vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFBNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.70

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.19

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

11.71

-1.73

AFB vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFB Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFB and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFBNMTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.80

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.13

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.54

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.00

-0.67

Drawdowns

AFB vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFB drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFB and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFBNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-16.36%

-34.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-2.65%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.32%

-5.77%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-16.36%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-16.36%

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.57%

0.00%

-9.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-2.91%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.72%

+0.86%

Volatility

AFB vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.25%. This indicates that AFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFBNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

1.25%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.73%

2.26%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

3.03%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

4.03%

+6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.24%

4.40%

+6.84%

AFB vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFB has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFB vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

AFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than NMTRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
5.02%4.72%3.83%3.62%5.26%4.32%4.18%3.93%4.53%4.71%5.34%5.80%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFB and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFB has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to NMTRX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFB dropped -50.98% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFB and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer