PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFAVX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFAVX achieves a -6.96% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 28.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AFAVX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 6.48%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.


AFAVX

1D
1.42%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-6.96%
6M
-17.60%
1Y
-10.18%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
6.48%

YAFFX

1D
-1.47%
1M
4.04%
YTD
28.79%
6M
11.34%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFAVX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund
-6.96%0.46%17.62%12.52%-16.21%7.79%-0.85%37.09%-3.81%10.96%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
28.79%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AFAVX and YAFFX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between AFAVX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFAVX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFAVX
AFAVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AFAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AFAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFAVXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.33

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

1.58

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

5.70

-6.74

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFAVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFAVX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFAVXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

1.21

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.55

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.62

-0.24

Drawdowns

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFAVX drawdown since its inception was -40.83%, smaller than the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFAVX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFAVXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.83%

-43.80%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-17.08%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.03%

-18.88%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-21.31%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-30.62%

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.92%

-1.98%

-18.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-6.21%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.84%

4.71%

+5.13%

Volatility

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) is 3.73%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that AFAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFAVXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

6.32%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

22.32%

-6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

22.25%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

18.11%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

16.53%

+2.71%

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFAVX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFAVX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFAVX nor YAFFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFAVX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund
0.00%0.00%16.13%2.79%1.00%0.39%0.58%3.72%7.83%8.37%7.53%0.00%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFAVX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to AFAVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFAVX dropped -40.83% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFAVX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer