PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AETH vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AETH vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AETH vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
-5.50%-0.11%19.02%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
-23.42%-6.56%100.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -5.50% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -23.42% return.


AETH

1D
0.01%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
-5.50%
6M
-27.04%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZBC

1D
-1.70%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
-23.42%
6M
-45.55%
1Y
-18.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AETH vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AETH vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AETH vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AETHEZBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

-0.51

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

-0.49

+1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.94

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.43

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

-0.91

+1.98

AETH vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AETH and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AETHEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.51

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.35

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between AETH and EZBC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AETH vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.55%2.41%14.73%6.64%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AETH vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, roughly equal to the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and EZBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AETHEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-49.37%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.40%

-49.37%

+7.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.19%

-46.69%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

-14.24%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

23.44%

+2.50%

Volatility

AETH vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) has a higher volatility of 16.19% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 10.87%. This indicates that AETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AETHEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.19%

10.87%

+5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.66%

36.69%

-8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.00%

45.29%

+5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.10%

51.05%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.10%

51.05%

+5.05%