AETH vs. CBOL
AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AETH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
AETH vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.03% return.
AETH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AETH vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -9.79% | -13.94% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -2.03% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AETH and CBOL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AETH vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
AETH
CBOL
AETH vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AETH | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AETH | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -1.80 | +2.17 |
Drawdowns
AETH vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AETH | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.78% | -4.91% | -42.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.85% | -4.64% | -39.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -3.21% | -21.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.86% | — | — |
Volatility
AETH vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AETH | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.03% | 3.88% | +41.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 3.88% | +50.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 3.88% | +50.80% |
AETH vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
AETH vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than CBOL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AETH and CBOL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.
AETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AETH and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for AETH and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer