PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEPGX vs. PGHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEPGX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than PGHAX's 4.47% return.


AEPGX

1D
3.17%
1M
-0.81%
6M
3.68%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.13%
ALL TIME*
8.45%

PGHAX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.83%
6M
3.64%
YTD
4.47%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
9.37%28.88%2.63%15.65%-23.06%-1.64%38.62%
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
4.47%15.58%1.69%9.48%-4.39%19.99%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between AEPGX and PGHAX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between AEPGX and PGHAX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEPGX vs. PGHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AEPGX
AEPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AEPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AEPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PGHAX
PGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEPGXPGHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.47

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

6.05

+0.26

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the PGHAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEPGX and PGHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEPGX drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, which is greater than PGHAX's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPGX and PGHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEPGXPGHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.98%

-20.52%

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-9.68%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.75%

-20.52%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.53%

-20.52%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-3.02%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-5.59%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.95%

-0.41%

Volatility

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEPGXPGHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.61%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

11.64%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

15.20%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

14.71%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

14.55%

+2.34%

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEPGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PGHAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Dividend Comparison

AEPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.55%, more than PGHAX's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
16.55%13.69%4.56%3.57%1.72%5.15%0.17%2.79%6.33%4.66%1.24%3.05%
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.78%1.86%4.71%5.33%7.48%11.17%8.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEPGX and PGHAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEPGX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to PGHAX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPGX dropped -53.98% vs PGHAX's -20.52%.

PGHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEPGX and PGHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer