AEPGX vs. PGHAX
AEPGX (American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A) and PGHAX (Putnam Global Health Care Fund) are both mutual funds - AEPGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by American Funds, while PGHAX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Putnam. Over the past 5 years, AEPGX returned 3.35%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for PGHAX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEPGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PGHAX.
Performance
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEPGX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than PGHAX's 0.51% return.
AEPGX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 24.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
PGHAX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A | 9.44% | 28.88% | 2.63% | 15.65% | -23.06% | -1.64% | 38.62% |
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 0.51% | 15.58% | 1.69% | 9.48% | -4.39% | 19.99% | 13.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEPGX and PGHAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between AEPGX and PGHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEPGX vs. PGHAX — Risk / Return Rank
AEPGX
PGHAX
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEPGX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.70 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 4.18 | +2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEPGX drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, which is greater than PGHAX's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPGX and PGHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEPGX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.98% | -20.52% | -33.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -9.68% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.75% | -20.52% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.53% | -20.52% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -3.69% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -5.65% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.93% | -0.55% |
Volatility
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) at 4.86%. This indicates that AEPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEPGX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 4.86% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 10.51% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 14.51% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 14.44% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 14.44% | +2.58% |
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEPGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PGHAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEPGX vs. PGHAX - Dividend Comparison
AEPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than PGHAX's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A | 10.00% | 13.69% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 1.72% | 5.15% | 0.17% | 2.79% | 6.33% | 4.66% | 1.24% | 3.05% |
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 1.85% | 1.86% | 4.71% | 5.33% | 7.48% | 11.17% | 8.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEPGX and PGHAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEPGX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to PGHAX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPGX dropped -53.98% vs PGHAX's -20.52%.
AEPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEPGX and PGHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer