AEPFX vs. RERGX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX).
AEPFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 1, 2008. RERGX is managed by American Funds.
Performance
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 | -2.87% | 29.19% | 2.89% | 15.98% | -22.86% | 2.74% | 25.12% | 27.28% | -17.41% | 31.04% |
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 | -1.04% | 29.34% | 3.00% | 16.11% | -22.77% | 2.84% | 25.27% | 27.40% | -17.33% | 31.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEPFX achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly lower than RERGX's -1.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEPFX having a 7.86% annualized return and RERGX not far ahead at 8.17%.
AEPFX
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
RERGX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 23.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEPFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AEPFX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank
AEPFX
RERGX
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEPFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.96 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.97 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 7.40 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEPFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.38 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between AEPFX and RERGX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison
AEPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.33%, more than RERGX's 14.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 | 14.33% | 13.92% | 4.86% | 3.86% | 1.93% | 10.10% | 0.34% | 3.04% | 3.06% | 4.89% | 1.54% | 3.35% |
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 | 14.10% | 13.95% | 4.96% | 3.95% | 2.02% | 10.19% | 0.41% | 3.14% | 3.17% | 4.99% | 1.64% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEPFX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than RERGX's maximum drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPFX and RERGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEPFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -37.30% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -12.52% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.37% | -37.30% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | -37.30% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.13% | -8.45% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -9.28% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.34% | -0.04% |
Volatility
AEPFX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) at 6.66%. This indicates that AEPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AEPFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 6.66% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 11.68% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 16.45% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 16.48% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 16.81% | -0.01% |