AEPFX vs. DFIV
AEPFX (American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AEPFX returned 16.23%/yr vs 23.90%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEPFX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEPFX achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 11.54% return.
AEPFX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
DFIV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 | 12.28% | 29.19% | 2.89% | 15.98% | -22.86% | -6.17% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 11.54% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEPFX and DFIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between AEPFX and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEPFX vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
AEPFX
DFIV
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEPFX | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.63 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 14.02 | -5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEPFX | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.56 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.94 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEPFX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPFX and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEPFX | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -25.42% | -23.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -9.66% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -14.72% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -4.48% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.49% | +0.83% |
Volatility
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that AEPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEPFX | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 3.89% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 10.99% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 13.69% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 16.63% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.63% | +0.30% |
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEPFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEPFX vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
AEPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than DFIV's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 | 12.40% | 13.92% | 4.86% | 3.86% | 1.93% | 10.10% | 0.34% | 3.04% | 3.06% | 4.89% | 1.54% | 3.35% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.55% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEPFX and DFIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEPFX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPFX dropped -48.79% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEPFX and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer