PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEP.L vs. FDY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) and Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEP.L is traded in GBp, while FDY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FDY.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEP.L achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than FDY.TO's 99.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AEP.L has underperformed FDY.TO with an annualized return of 14.66%, while FDY.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 49.65% annualized return.


AEP.L

1D
1.86%
1M
-22.68%
YTD
11.97%
6M
15.34%
1Y
98.13%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*
14.66%

FDY.TO

1D
-1.73%
1M
4.16%
YTD
99.61%
6M
156.57%
1Y
593.40%
3Y*
90.30%
5Y*
54.83%
10Y*
49.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
11.97%124.03%-0.64%-12.84%11.63%23.64%1.64%1.54%-25.84%14.42%
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
99.61%259.03%10.18%13.54%-25.24%219.82%32.56%-9.70%-53.47%101.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AEP.L and FDY.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2010

0.03

The correlation between AEP.L and FDY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEP.L:

£594.92M

FDY.TO:

CA$1.44B

EPS

AEP.L:

£4.05

FDY.TO:

-CA$0.12

PB Ratio

AEP.L:

1.02

FDY.TO:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEP.L:

£838.60M

FDY.TO:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEP.L:

£214.57M

FDY.TO:

-CA$322.61K

EBITDA (TTM)

AEP.L:

£230.87M

FDY.TO:

-CA$33.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FDY.TO
FDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) and Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEP.LFDY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.71

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

17.63

-14.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

60.06

-45.25

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 8.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEP.L and FDY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEP.LFDY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

8.75

-6.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.48

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.23

+0.02

Drawdowns

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEP.L drawdown since its inception was -68.81%, smaller than the maximum FDY.TO drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEP.L and FDY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEP.LFDY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.81%

-99.03%

+30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.66%

-33.97%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.66%

-48.04%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.66%

-61.23%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.83%

-83.27%

+21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.42%

-17.11%

-15.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-39.87%

+16.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

9.95%

-3.35%

Volatility

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a higher volatility of 30.89% compared to Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) at 22.46%. This indicates that AEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEP.LFDY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.89%

22.46%

+8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.71%

54.27%

-16.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.65%

68.43%

-23.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.03%

65.15%

-32.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

103.58%

-69.49%

Dividends

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Dividend Comparison

AEP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while FDY.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.28%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.41%0.52%0.39%0.00%0.00%
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%28.29%49.11%93.28%

Financials

AEP.L vs. FDY.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc and Faraday Copper Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M202120222023202420252026
235.87M
0
(AEP.L) Total Revenue
(FDY.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AEP.L values in GBp, FDY.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


AEP.L and FDY.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEP.L and FDY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer