AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AEMU.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AEMU.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AEMU.L returned 7.22%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for MEUD.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.

Performance

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AEMU.L is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMU.L achieves a 26.47% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 6.32% return.

AEMU.L

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 26.47%
• 6M: 29.24%
• 1Y: 53.33%
• 3Y*: 24.08%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: —

MEUD.L

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)	26.47%	34.26%	7.15%	7.17%	-15.46%	-15.10%
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	6.32%	36.05%	1.93%	19.47%	-15.19%	13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMU.L and MEUD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021	0.42

The correlation between AEMU.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AEMU.L	MEUD.L
Technology	42.0%	9.4%
Financial Services	18.0%	24.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	6.9%
Industrials	6.3%	20.1%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.0%
Communication Services	5.9%	3.1%
Energy	3.4%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	12.7%
Utilities	2.0%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMU.L

AEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MEUD.L

MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AEMU.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.26	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	1.85	+2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.23	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	1.59	+3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.22	5.66	+10.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMU.L and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEMU.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.26	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.50	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.43	+0.06

Drawdowns

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.23%, which is greater than MEUD.L's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMU.L and MEUD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMU.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.23%	-36.06%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.52%	-11.53%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.04%	-14.53%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.44%	-32.40%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-1.75%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.60%	-7.67%	-7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	3.24%	+0.66%

Volatility

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 4.95%. This indicates that AEMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMU.L	MEUD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	4.95%	+3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.87%	11.96%	+4.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	14.53%	+6.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	17.51%	+6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	17.71%	+6.03%

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AEMU.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

AEMU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)	1.53%	1.94%	2.50%	2.42%	2.87%	1.86%
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMU.L and MEUD.L in my portfolio?

AEMU.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMU.L or MEUD.L?

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMU.L or MEUD.L?

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AEMU.L.

What is the main difference between AEMU.L and MEUD.L?

AEMU.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. AEMU.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AEMU.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.