AEMU.L vs. 500G.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L).

AEMU.L and 500G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEMU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021. 500G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 4, 2021. Both AEMU.L and 500G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)	5.01%	34.26%	7.15%	7.17%	-15.46%	-15.10%
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	-4.22%	17.70%	25.32%	26.22%	-18.60%	24.14%

Different Trading Currencies

AEMU.L is traded in USD, while 500G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 500G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMU.L achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than 500G.L's -4.22% return.

AEMU.L

• 1D: 4.14%
• 1M: -6.38%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 35.33%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: —

500G.L

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: -4.22%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 18.23%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: 14.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 500G.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

AEMU.L

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)

500G.L

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc

Return for Risk

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMU.L

AEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

500G.L

500G.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
500G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
500G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
500G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
500G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
500G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AEMU.L	500G.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.12	+0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.62	+1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.23	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.94	+0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	7.98	-0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the 500G.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMU.L and 500G.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEMU.L	500G.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.12	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.76	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.92	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between AEMU.L and 500G.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Dividend Comparison

AEMU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while 500G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AEMU.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D)	1.84%	1.94%	2.50%	2.42%	2.87%	1.86%
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.23%, which is greater than 500G.L's maximum drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMU.L and 500G.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMU.L	500G.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.23%	-25.52%	-12.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.52%	-10.72%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.44%	-21.12%	-16.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	-4.76%	-4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-3.33%	-13.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	2.04%	+2.02%

Volatility

AEMU.L vs. 500G.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR - USD (D) (AEMU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) at 4.47%. This indicates that AEMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMU.L	500G.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.40%	4.47%	+3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	8.76%	+5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.06%	16.30%	+5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.27%	15.71%	+7.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.39%	16.11%	+7.28%