PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEMSX vs. TEQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMSX achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly higher than TEQLX's 29.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEMSX having a 10.35% annualized return and TEQLX not far ahead at 10.56%.


AEMSX

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.31%
YTD
32.71%
6M
34.85%
1Y
63.05%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.35%

TEQLX

1D
-0.71%
1M
8.36%
YTD
29.20%
6M
32.06%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
32.71%32.19%3.81%6.49%-26.28%7.03%27.52%20.24%-14.71%29.95%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
29.20%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-14.60%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMSX and TEQLX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2010

0.95

The correlation between AEMSX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEMSX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMSX
AEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEMSXTEQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.60

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

4.40

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.77

17.41

+1.35

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the TEQLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMSX and TEQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEMSXTEQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

3.26

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.35

+0.06

Drawdowns

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMSX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, roughly equal to the maximum TEQLX drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMSX and TEQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMSXTEQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.58%

-39.33%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-13.32%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-15.97%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

-37.05%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.58%

-39.33%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.71%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-14.60%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.35%

+0.11%

Volatility

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) at 7.82%. This indicates that AEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMSXTEQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

7.82%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

15.45%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

17.99%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

16.98%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

17.68%

+1.01%

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEMSX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison

AEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than TEQLX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
4.63%6.14%0.95%1.39%1.83%22.97%0.68%1.82%1.57%1.09%1.08%2.32%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.19%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AEMSX and TEQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AEMSX has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to TEQLX (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMSX dropped -38.58% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.

AEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEMSX and TEQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer