PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEME.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEME.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


AEME.L

1D
-1.56%
1M
5.74%
YTD
26.36%
6M
29.09%
1Y
53.12%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AEME.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
26.36%34.94%6.72%8.41%-19.84%-9.55%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AEME.L and MWRD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.45

The correlation between AEME.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AEME.L
MWRD.L

Technology

43.0%
24.7%

Financial Services

17.9%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.5%

Industrials

6.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

6.2%
7.5%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.8%

Energy

3.5%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
6.7%

Healthcare

2.6%
12.4%

Utilities

1.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.4%

Technology

AEME.L
43.0%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

AEME.L
17.9%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AEME.L
8.7%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

AEME.L
6.8%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Communication Services

AEME.L
6.2%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Basic Materials

AEME.L
5.9%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Energy

AEME.L
3.5%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

AEME.L
2.7%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Healthcare

AEME.L
2.6%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Utilities

AEME.L
1.9%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

AEME.L
1.0%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEME.L
AEME.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AEME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AEME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEME.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEME.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEME.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

Volatility

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEME.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEME.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AEME.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEME.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AEME.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AEME.L.

AEME.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. AEME.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AEME.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEME.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer