PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEME.L vs. HYEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEME.L is traded in USD, while HYEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HYEA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly higher than HYEA.L's 0.44% return.


AEME.L

1D
1.13%
1M
-8.62%
6M
10.76%
YTD
17.86%
1Y
33.18%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.15%

HYEA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.74%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AEME.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
17.86%34.94%6.72%8.42%-19.85%18.82%6.13%
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.44%15.17%2.47%12.66%-12.07%0.88%7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AEME.L and HYEA.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEME.L
AEME.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AEME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
AEME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEME.LHYEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

0.86

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

2.67

+5.05

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEME.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEME.L and HYEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than HYEA.L's maximum drawdown of -30.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and HYEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEME.LHYEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-30.15%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-4.79%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-4.90%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-22.62%

-12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.12%

-1.51%

-8.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-8.29%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

1.54%

+2.75%

Volatility

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) at 1.02%. This indicates that AEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEME.LHYEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

1.02%

+8.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.98%

4.10%

+15.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.21%

5.71%

+16.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

8.13%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

10.06%

+11.83%

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEME.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEME.L vs. HYEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEME.L nor HYEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AEME.L and HYEA.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AEME.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AEME.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYEA.L.

AEME.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HYEA.L is High Yield Bonds. AEME.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while HYEA.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AEME.L and 0.50% for HYEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEME.L and HYEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer