AEME.L vs. BRK-B
AEME.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, AEME.L returned 7.32%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.78% return.
AEME.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 53.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEME.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 26.36% | 34.94% | 6.72% | 8.41% | -19.84% | -9.55% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.78% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEME.L and BRK-B is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between AEME.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEME.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
AEME.L
BRK-B
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.98 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | -0.27 | +4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | -0.57 | +15.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | -0.18 | +2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.61 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -53.86% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -9.42% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.13% | -14.95% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.21% | -26.58% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -11.33% | +8.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -11.07% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 4.46% | -0.80% |
Volatility
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.72%. This indicates that AEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 3.72% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.83% | 10.70% | +6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 14.32% | +5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 17.11% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 19.43% | -0.72% |
Dividends
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEME.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEME.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEME.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer