AEME.L vs. BRK-B
AEME.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, AEME.L returned 6.85%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.27% return.
AEME.L
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 33.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.58%
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEME.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 17.86% | 34.94% | 6.72% | 8.42% | -19.85% | 18.82% | 6.13% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.27% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEME.L and BRK-B is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020 | 0.18 |
The correlation between AEME.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEME.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
AEME.L
BRK-B
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.39 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 0.82 | +6.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -53.86% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -9.42% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.14% | -14.95% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.00% | -26.58% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -8.99% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -11.06% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.50% | -0.21% |
Volatility
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.42%. This indicates that AEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEME.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 4.42% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.98% | 11.07% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.21% | 14.57% | +7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 17.09% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 19.40% | +2.49% |
Dividends
AEME.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEME.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEME.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEME.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer