PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) is a stock, while XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) is Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO returned 16.42%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for XIU.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has outperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 16.42%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.74% annualized return.

AEM.TO

1D
2.94%
1M
1.04%
YTD
5.77%
6M
2.79%
1Y
46.19%
3Y*
54.75%
5Y*
26.46%
10Y*
16.42%

XIU.TO

1D
1.29%
1M
5.10%
YTD
11.56%
6M
12.35%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited		5.77%109.61%58.54%6.66%8.18%-22.88%13.71%46.75%-3.97%3.72%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		11.56%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM.TO and XIU.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 1999

0.26

Over the past year, AEM.TO and XIU.TO have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Often compared with AEM.TO:
AEM.TO vs. ABX.TOAEM.TO vs. AGIAEM.TO vs. GOLD.TOAEM.TO vs. XAUUSD=XAEM.TO vs. WDO.TOAEM.TO vs. HBMAEM.TO vs. BTO.TO
Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO

Return for Risk

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AEM.TOXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
2.89

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.54
3.86

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.52

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.45

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

20.69

-17.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AEM.TOXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.89

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.15

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.85

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.51

-0.29

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.38%, which is greater than XIU.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and XIU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AEM.TOXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.38%

-52.31%

-32.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.87%

-7.65%

-23.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.87%

-12.36%

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.10%

-16.36%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.60%

-35.46%

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.73%

0.00%

-28.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.18%

-11.62%

-22.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

1.64%

+10.99%

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) at 3.43%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AEM.TOXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

3.43%

+11.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.13%

9.39%

+24.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.53%

11.79%

+30.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.90%

12.79%

+22.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.87%

15.01%

+20.86%

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than XIU.TO's 2.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited		0.70%0.96%1.95%2.99%2.96%3.13%1.41%0.92%1.04%0.92%0.98%1.13%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.17%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

AEM.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer