AEM.TO vs. ORCL

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) and ORCL (Oracle Corporation) are both stocks. AEM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ORCL operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO returned 13.28%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for ORCL. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AEM.TO is traded in CAD, while ORCL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ORCL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -11.63% return, which is significantly higher than ORCL's -38.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEM.TO having a 13.28% annualized return and ORCL not far behind at 13.27%.

AEM.TO

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -6.16%
• 6M: -30.01%
• YTD: -11.63%
• 1Y: 20.37%
• 3Y*: 46.52%
• 5Y*: 24.97%
• 10Y*: 13.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.74%

ORCL

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -27.36%
• 6M: -33.18%
• YTD: -38.71%
• 1Y: -50.38%
• 3Y*: 2.61%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 13.27%
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	CA$173.15M	CA$196.58M	CA$229.53M
ORCL Oracle Corporation	CA$7.32B	CA$7.56B	CA$7.03B

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	-11.63%	109.63%	58.54%	6.65%	8.01%	-23.56%	13.64%	46.58%	-4.22%	3.57%
ORCL Oracle Corporation	-38.71%	12.74%	73.54%	27.83%	1.40%	36.82%	21.30%	14.42%	5.19%	16.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM.TO and ORCL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2006	0.06

The correlation between AEM.TO and ORCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AEM.TO : CA$102.41B ORCL : $331.23B
EPS AEM.TO : $10.66 ORCL : $5.86
PE Ratio AEM.TO : 13.65 ORCL : 19.62
PEG Ratio AEM.TO : 0.20 ORCL : 0.80
PS Ratio AEM.TO : 5.39 ORCL : 4.98
PB Ratio AEM.TO : 2.78 ORCL : 7.79
Total Revenue (TTM) AEM.TO : $13.56B ORCL : $67.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) AEM.TO : $8.26B ORCL : $79.58B
EBITDA (TTM) AEM.TO : $9.54B ORCL : $6.20B

Return for Risk

AEM.TO vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM.TO

AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ORCL

ORCL Risk / Return Rank: 12
ORCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ORCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ORCL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ORCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ORCL Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEM.TO	ORCL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	-0.77	+1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	-1.23	+2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.87	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	-0.79	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	-1.26	+2.35

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the ORCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and ORCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, which is greater than ORCL's maximum drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and ORCL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEM.TO	ORCL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.33%	-63.95%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.27%	-63.95%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.27%	-63.95%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.27%	-63.95%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.07%	-63.95%	+8.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.45%	-63.95%	+23.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.38%	-10.43%	-18.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.68%	39.95%	-21.27%

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) is 10.60%, while Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that AEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEM.TO	ORCL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.60%	14.12%	-3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.98%	42.78%	-6.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.49%	65.77%	-21.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.52%	43.10%	-7.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.03%	36.04%	-0.01%

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ORCL's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	1.15%	0.97%	1.95%	2.98%	2.81%	2.08%	1.34%	0.81%	0.80%	0.77%	0.75%	0.95%
ORCL Oracle Corporation	1.74%	0.97%	0.96%	1.44%	1.57%	1.38%	1.48%	1.72%	1.68%	1.52%	1.56%	1.56%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEM.TO and ORCL in my portfolio?

AEM.TO and ORCL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.