PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM.TO vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEM.TO is traded in CAD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -11.63% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 14.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.28%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 65.99% annualized return.


AEM.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
-6.16%
6M
-30.01%
YTD
-11.63%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
46.52%
5Y*
24.97%
10Y*
13.28%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

NVDA

1D
-0.87%
1M
3.08%
6M
12.81%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
69.30%
5Y*
64.11%
10Y*
65.99%
ALL TIME*
37.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$173.15MCA$196.58MCA$229.53M
CA$35.05BCA$38.11BCA$45.14B

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-11.63%109.63%58.54%6.65%8.01%-23.56%13.64%46.58%-4.22%3.57%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.26%32.57%194.22%230.95%-47.11%125.37%117.02%69.65%-25.00%69.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM.TO and NVDA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2006

0.09

The correlation between AEM.TO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM.TO:

CA$102.41B

NVDA:

$5.01T

EPS

AEM.TO:

$10.66

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

AEM.TO:

13.65

NVDA:

31.70

PEG Ratio

AEM.TO:

0.20

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

AEM.TO:

5.39

NVDA:

19.96

PB Ratio

AEM.TO:

2.78

NVDA:

25.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM.TO:

$13.56B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM.TO:

$8.26B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM.TO:

$9.54B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM.TO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEM.TONVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.13

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

2.39

-1.29

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -80.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEM.TONVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.33%

-80.18%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.27%

-20.81%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.27%

-38.45%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.27%

-63.60%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.07%

-63.60%

+8.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.45%

-9.67%

-30.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.38%

-28.40%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.68%

9.88%

+8.80%

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have volatilities of 10.60% and 10.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEM.TONVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

10.34%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.98%

27.37%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.49%

35.54%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.52%

52.22%

-16.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.03%

50.53%

-14.50%

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.15%0.97%1.95%2.98%2.81%2.08%1.34%0.81%0.80%0.77%0.75%0.95%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
4.10B
81.62B
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEM.TO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
66.4%
74.9%
Portfolio components
AEM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

AEM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

AEM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEM.TO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer