PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEHL vs. D
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEHL vs. D - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited (AEHL) and Dominion Energy, Inc. (D). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEHL achieves a -89.92% return, which is significantly lower than D's 15.86% return. Over the past 10 years, AEHL has underperformed D with an annualized return of -62.93%, while D has yielded a comparatively higher 3.48% annualized return.


AEHL

1D
-8.55%
1M
112.13%
YTD
-89.92%
6M
-94.48%
1Y
-91.04%
3Y*
-92.52%
5Y*
-82.61%
10Y*
-62.93%

D

1D
1.59%
1M
6.63%
YTD
15.86%
6M
14.72%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
3.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEHL vs. D - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited
-89.92%-80.60%-91.21%-56.03%-62.89%-35.89%21.57%-55.56%-35.98%4.82%
D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
15.86%13.96%20.43%-19.13%-19.12%8.12%-5.35%21.50%-7.59%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AEHL and D is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007

0.04

Fundamentals

EPS

AEHL:

-$42.38

D:

$3.67

PS Ratio

AEHL:

0.00

D:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEHL:

$1.10B

D:

$17.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEHL:

$1.12M

D:

$6.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEHL:

-$100.06M

D:

$7.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEHL vs. D — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEHL
AEHL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AEHL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEHL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEHL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AEHL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEHL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

D
D Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
D Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
D Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
D Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
D Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEHL vs. D - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited (AEHL) and Dominion Energy, Inc. (D). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

2.45

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

6.66

-8.10

AEHL vs. D - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEHL Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the D Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEHL and D, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

1.15

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.07

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.41

0.15

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.49

-0.92

Drawdowns

AEHL vs. D - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEHL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than D's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEHL and D.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-52.20%

-47.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.11%

-9.77%

-88.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.98%

-26.41%

-73.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-52.20%

-47.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-52.20%

-47.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-8.32%

-91.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.53%

-9.58%

-67.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.98%

3.59%

+59.39%

Volatility

AEHL vs. D - Volatility Comparison

Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited (AEHL) has a higher volatility of 130.54% compared to Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) at 11.16%. This indicates that AEHL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

130.54%

11.16%

+119.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

200.61%

16.52%

+184.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

286.60%

20.78%

+265.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

180.61%

22.83%

+157.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.98%

23.72%

+129.26%

Dividends

AEHL vs. D - Dividend Comparison

AEHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
4.02%4.56%4.96%5.68%4.35%3.21%4.59%4.43%4.67%3.74%3.66%3.83%

Financials

AEHL vs. D - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited and Dominion Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B202120222023202420252026
283.87M
5.02B
(AEHL) Total Revenue
(D) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEHL vs. D - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited and Dominion Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
-4.1%
0
Portfolio components
AEHL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of -11.54M and revenue of 283.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.1%.

D - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEHL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -49.31M and revenue of 283.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.4%.

D - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 5.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

AEHL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited reported a net income of -75.98M and revenue of 283.87M, resulting in a net margin of -26.8%.

D - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 690.00K and revenue of 5.02B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEHL and D have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEHL has higher volatility (130.54%) compared to D (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEHL dropped -100.00% vs D's -52.20%.

D currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEHL and D

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer