AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L
AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and XG7S.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C) are both Global Bonds funds - AEGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP while XG7S.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AEGG.L returned 3.84%/yr vs -0.62%/yr for XG7S.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XG7S.L.
Performance
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AEGG.L is traded in GBP, while XG7S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XG7S.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEGG.L achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than XG7S.L's -0.90% return.
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XG7S.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 1.33%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -2.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.49% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 5.65% | -12.74% | -0.69% |
XG7S.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C | -0.90% | -0.22% | -1.85% | -0.74% | -8.86% | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEGG.L and XG7S.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L — Risk / Return Rank
AEGG.L
XG7S.L
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEGG.L | XG7S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.10 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 0.13 | +3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEGG.L | XG7S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.07 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.15 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEGG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, smaller than the maximum XG7S.L drawdown of -25.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEGG.L and XG7S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEGG.L | XG7S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -25.59% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -15.40% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | -15.40% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -23.76% | +22.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -15.52% | +7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 10.76% | -9.93% |
Volatility
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEGG.L | XG7S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.44% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 3.54% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13% | 20.76% | -17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 14.16% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 14.59% | -10.00% |
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7S.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AEGG.L vs. XG7S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEGG.L nor XG7S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEGG.L and XG7S.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XG7S.L.
AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while XG7S.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AEGG.L and 0.20% for XG7S.L.
Find the right allocation for AEGG.L and XG7S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer