AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L
AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) are both Global Bonds funds - AEGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP while HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AEGG.L returned 3.19% vs 5.14% for HBKS.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. AEGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HBKS.L.
Performance
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEGG.L achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than HBKS.L's 0.69% return.
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBKS.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.49% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 4.66% |
HBKS.L HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD | 0.69% | -0.34% | 4.48% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEGG.L and HBKS.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
AEGG.L
HBKS.L
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEGG.L | HBKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.96 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 2.08 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEGG.L | HBKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.73 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.35 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEGG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, which is greater than HBKS.L's maximum drawdown of -8.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEGG.L and HBKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEGG.L | HBKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -8.09% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -5.33% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -2.83% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -2.41% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 2.46% | -1.63% |
Volatility
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) is 1.42%, while HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that AEGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEGG.L | HBKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.91% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 5.27% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13% | 7.00% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 6.93% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 6.93% | -2.34% |
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HBKS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEGG.L vs. HBKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEGG.L nor HBKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEGG.L and HBKS.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.
AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AEGG.L and 0.40% for HBKS.L.
Find the right allocation for AEGG.L and HBKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer