AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L
AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) are both Global Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AEGG.L returned 3.84%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for AGHG.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for AGHG.L.
Performance
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AEGG.L is traded in GBP, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEGG.L achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than AGHG.L's 0.55% return.
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGHG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.49% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 5.65% | -4.94% |
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 0.55% | 4.58% | 2.41% | 5.75% | -4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEGG.L and AGHG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AEGG.L and AGHG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AEGG.L
AGHG.L
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEGG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 4.24 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEGG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.50 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEGG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, which is greater than AGHG.L's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEGG.L and AGHG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEGG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -6.65% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -2.24% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | -4.02% | +0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.02% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -1.70% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.78% | +0.05% |
Volatility
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) at 1.23%. This indicates that AEGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEGG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.23% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 2.22% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13% | 2.89% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.96% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.96% | -0.37% |
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AEGG.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison
AEGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 2.97% | 2.98% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEGG.L and AGHG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for AEGG.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AEGG.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.
Find the right allocation for AEGG.L and AGHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer