PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AE5A.DE achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 40.23% return.


AE5A.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.57%
YTD
27.41%
6M
28.14%
1Y
48.94%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.98%

EMXC.DE

1D
-1.80%
1M
5.62%
YTD
40.23%
6M
42.71%
1Y
66.91%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
27.41%19.26%14.36%5.58%-14.19%4.19%7.49%8.03%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
40.23%19.92%9.13%14.33%-13.60%17.56%2.27%6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019

0.86

The correlation between AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AE5A.DEEMXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.62

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

5.78

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.35

21.97

-4.62

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AE5A.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

3.46

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.69

-0.27

Drawdowns

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AE5A.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum EMXC.DE drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AE5A.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-38.77%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-11.87%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-20.48%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-20.48%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-2.53%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-6.73%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.13%

-0.26%

Volatility

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) is 7.32%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that AE5A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AE5A.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

8.44%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

17.23%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

19.85%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

15.83%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.50%

+0.55%

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AE5A.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AE5A.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

AE5A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%2.15%3.38%3.80%2.44%1.62%1.71%2.01%2.17%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for AE5A.DE and 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AE5A.DE and EMXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer