PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AE5A.DE having a 27.41% return and EDM2.DE slightly lower at 26.35%.


AE5A.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.57%
YTD
27.41%
6M
28.14%
1Y
48.94%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.98%

EDM2.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
3.82%
YTD
26.35%
6M
26.81%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
27.41%19.26%14.36%5.58%-14.19%4.19%7.49%7.42%
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.35%19.81%13.36%4.56%-16.00%4.73%7.76%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019

0.96

The correlation between AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EDM2.DE
EDM2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AE5A.DEEDM2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

4.32

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.35

15.65

+1.70

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AE5A.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.63

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.45

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.49

-0.07

Drawdowns

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AE5A.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than EDM2.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AE5A.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-32.32%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-10.88%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-19.52%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-25.43%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-2.66%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-11.10%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.01%

-0.14%

Volatility

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) have volatilities of 7.32% and 7.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AE5A.DEEDM2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

7.43%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

15.11%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

17.92%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

16.83%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.13%

-0.08%

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AE5A.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EDM2.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AE5A.DE vs. EDM2.DE - Dividend Comparison

AE5A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while EDM2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%2.15%3.38%3.80%2.44%1.62%1.71%2.01%2.17%
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EDM2.DE.

AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for AE5A.DE and 0.18% for EDM2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AE5A.DE and EDM2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer