PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVMX vs. SMQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVMX achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMQFX's 25.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ADVMX has underperformed SMQFX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while SMQFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


ADVMX

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.23%
YTD
14.22%
6M
16.57%
1Y
50.27%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
8.86%

SMQFX

1D
2.22%
1M
7.90%
YTD
25.30%
6M
29.19%
1Y
59.16%
3Y*
27.33%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
14.22%45.69%-2.43%16.20%-11.69%9.81%10.81%7.15%-18.47%25.07%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
25.30%40.14%9.19%16.67%-19.31%8.09%17.33%18.91%-17.67%33.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVMX and SMQFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.88

The correlation between ADVMX and SMQFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVMX vs. SMQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVMX
ADVMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ADVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SMQFX
SMQFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SMQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SMQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVMXSMQFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

3.71

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

4.62

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.71

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

4.33

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.10

17.38

-2.28

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the SMQFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVMX and SMQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVMXSMQFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

3.71

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.66

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.55

-0.14

Drawdowns

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVMX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than SMQFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVMX and SMQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVMXSMQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-40.14%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-13.62%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-15.03%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-36.37%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.17%

-40.14%

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

0.00%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-12.06%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.40%

-0.17%

Volatility

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) is 4.79%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that ADVMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVMXSMQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

6.90%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

14.03%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

16.49%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.76%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.92%

-0.81%

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SMQFX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADVMX vs. SMQFX - Dividend Comparison

ADVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, less than SMQFX's 24.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
9.33%10.65%0.00%0.95%1.13%1.51%1.51%2.84%1.48%3.06%2.18%1.89%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
24.12%30.23%6.43%3.24%5.32%17.70%1.80%1.89%11.55%2.70%2.15%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVMX and SMQFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMQFX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to ADVMX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVMX dropped -51.17% vs SMQFX's -40.14%.

SMQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVMX and SMQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer