PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVDX vs. CGFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVDX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ADVDX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.


ADVDX

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.95%
YTD
12.82%
6M
13.41%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.60%

CGFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.22%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADVDX
abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund
12.82%20.33%7.74%13.35%-13.36%16.80%10.33%25.43%-9.57%23.36%
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
1.26%5.79%4.85%-2.54%-9.99%1.39%6.37%7.26%0.97%1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVDX and CGFIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2003

0.10

Over the past year, ADVDX and CGFIX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVDX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVDX
ADVDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ADVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CGFIX
CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVDXCGFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.36

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

8.47

+5.68

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the CGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVDX and CGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVDXCGFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.09

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.04

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.40

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.89

-0.51

Drawdowns

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVDX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than CGFIX's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVDX and CGFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVDXCGFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-20.28%

-41.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-2.78%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-7.09%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-20.28%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.33%

-20.28%

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.76%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-3.19%

-13.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.77%

+1.25%

Volatility

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 1.09%. This indicates that ADVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVDXCGFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

1.09%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

2.32%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

3.14%

+8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

5.76%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

4.71%

+11.27%

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVDX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADVDX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison

ADVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than CGFIX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVDX
abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund
7.72%8.53%5.59%5.70%6.09%5.35%5.50%5.70%6.72%5.73%6.65%6.67%
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
6.15%5.51%6.43%2.08%0.00%7.49%0.23%3.29%6.05%0.33%1.12%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVDX and CGFIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADVDX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to CGFIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVDX dropped -62.03% vs CGFIX's -20.28%.

ADVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVDX and CGFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer