ADPV vs. SCHK
ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ADPV is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ADPV returned 26.59%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for SCHK. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
ADPV vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 8.54% return.
ADPV
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 34.24%
- 3Y*
- 26.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ADPV vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 11.09% | 21.19% | 43.88% | -0.62% | 0.43% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | 3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADPV and SCHK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ADPV and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
ADPV vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ADPV
SCHK
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
ADPV
SCHK
Energy
ADPV
SCHK
Healthcare
ADPV
SCHK
Basic Materials
ADPV
SCHK
Financial Services
ADPV
SCHK
Real Estate
ADPV
SCHK
Communication Services
ADPV
SCHK
Industrials
ADPV
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
ADPV
SCHK
Utilities
ADPV
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
ADPV
-
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADPV vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
ADPV
SCHK
ADPV vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADPV | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.65 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | 11.81 | -4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADPV vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADPV | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -34.80% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -8.97% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.30% | -19.21% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.98% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -5.16% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 2.01% | +2.69% |
Volatility
ADPV vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 4.96%. This indicates that ADPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADPV | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 4.96% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.59% | 10.10% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 12.84% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.34% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 19.12% | +1.90% |
ADPV vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADPV vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.67% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADPV and SCHK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADPV has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to SCHK (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 3-year performance, ADPV leads with 26.59% vs 20.74% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ADPV has performed better with a 26.59% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.63% for ADPV.
They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADPV and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer