ADPV vs. PSCM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADPV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Adaptiv, while PSCM is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. ADPV is actively managed, while PSCM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ADPV returned 26.59%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for PSCM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCM.

Performance

ADPV vs. PSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than PSCM's 23.80% return.

ADPV

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 34.24%
• 3Y*: 26.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCM

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 23.80%
• 6M: 22.73%
• 1Y: 53.82%
• 3Y*: 18.03%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPV vs. PSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	11.09%	21.19%	43.88%	-0.62%	0.43%
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	23.80%	15.59%	0.67%	19.86%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPV and PSCM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022	0.56

The correlation between ADPV and PSCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADPV vs. PSCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADPV	PSCM
Technology	22.3%	-
Energy	20.7%	7.1%
Healthcare	11.5%	-
Basic Materials	11.5%	90.9%
Financial Services	11.0%	0.1%
Real Estate	7.9%	-
Communication Services	7.4%	-
Industrials	7.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	1.8%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

ADPV vs. PSCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPV

ADPV Risk / Return Rank: 43
ADPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ADPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ADPV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ADPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ADPV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

PSCM

PSCM Risk / Return Rank: 74
PSCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PSCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PSCM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PSCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PSCM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPV vs. PSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADPV	PSCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.22	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.09	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.78	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	14.00	-6.70

ADPV vs. PSCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the PSCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPV and PSCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ADPV vs. PSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, smaller than the maximum PSCM drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and PSCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADPV	PSCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-51.34%	+29.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-14.33%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	-35.36%	+13.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-4.64%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-10.88%	+5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.70%	3.86%	+0.84%

Volatility

ADPV vs. PSCM - Volatility Comparison

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) have volatilities of 7.84% and 8.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADPV	PSCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	8.22%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.59%	17.32%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	24.46%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	25.83%	-4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	26.89%	-5.87%

ADPV vs. PSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADPV vs. PSCM - Dividend Comparison

ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than PSCM's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.67%	0.22%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	0.97%	1.17%	0.80%	0.81%	0.93%	0.67%	1.56%	1.14%	1.25%	0.61%	0.76%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADPV and PSCM in my portfolio?

ADPV and PSCM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADPV or PSCM?

PSCM has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to ADPV (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs PSCM's -51.34%.

Which ETF is better, ADPV or PSCM?

On 3-year performance, ADPV leads with 26.59% vs 18.03% for PSCM. On fees, PSCM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ADPV has been the lower-risk option at 7.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADPV or PSCM?

Over the 3-year period, ADPV has performed better with a 26.59% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADPV or PSCM?

PSCM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADPV or PSCM?

PSCM has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.63% for ADPV.

What is the main difference between ADPV and PSCM?

ADPV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCM is Materials. They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.29% for PSCM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.