ADPV vs. BUFX
ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADPV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Adaptiv, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
ADPV vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
ADPV
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 39.30%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADPV vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 10.73% | 19.93% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADPV and BUFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADPV vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
ADPV
BUFX
ADPV vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADPV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADPV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 2.68 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
ADPV vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADPV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -2.87% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -0.24% | -5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility
ADPV vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADPV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 3.98% | +20.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 3.98% | +16.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 3.98% | +16.86% |
ADPV vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADPV vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.67% | 0.22% | 0.25% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADPV and BUFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUFX is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUFX is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.
ADPV has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
ADPV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for ADPV and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer