ADOIX vs. HSGFX
ADOIX (ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund) and HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, ADOIX returned 9.74%/yr vs -2.72%/yr for HSGFX. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. ADOIX charges 1.72%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HSGFX.
Performance
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADOIX achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than HSGFX's -9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ADOIX has outperformed HSGFX with an annualized return of 9.74%, while HSGFX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.72% annualized return.
ADOIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- YTD
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
HSGFX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- -14.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.49%
- 5Y*
- -3.14%
- 10Y*
- -2.72%
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADOIX ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund | 13.08% | 10.02% | 54.06% | 6.71% | -12.83% | 0.94% | 22.46% | 2.36% | -0.97% | 17.86% |
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | -9.14% | 6.24% | -6.99% | -11.60% | 17.33% | -0.23% | 14.52% | -18.87% | 8.78% | -12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADOIX and HSGFX is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | -0.56 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ADOIX and HSGFX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.56 to -0.77, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADOIX vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank
ADOIX
HSGFX
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund (ADOIX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADOIX | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.82 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | -0.86 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | -1.68 | +7.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADOIX drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADOIX and HSGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADOIX | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.99% | -60.61% | +38.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -17.20% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -24.52% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -24.52% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.99% | -30.86% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -56.72% | +55.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -26.97% | +20.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 8.82% | -5.38% |
Volatility
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Volatility Comparison
ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund (ADOIX) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) at 5.19%. This indicates that ADOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADOIX | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 5.19% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 10.39% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 12.60% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 11.37% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 10.86% | +3.23% |
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADOIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADOIX vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison
ADOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than HSGFX's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADOIX ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund | 2.53% | 2.86% | 44.03% | 1.32% | 6.56% | 2.40% | 4.34% | 0.35% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | 2.56% | 2.33% | 3.00% | 3.10% | 1.08% | 0.42% | 0.16% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.50% | 0.28% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADOIX and HSGFX have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADOIX has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to HSGFX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADOIX dropped -21.99% vs HSGFX's -60.61%.
ADOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADOIX and HSGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer