PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADME vs. WTMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADME vs. WTMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than WTMF's 8.50% return.


ADME

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.93%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADME vs. WTMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
9.81%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-6.05%17.58%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%0.24%-3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and WTMF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2016

0.24

Over the past year, ADME and WTMF have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ADME vs. WTMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADME
WTMF

Technology

35.2%
17.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
15.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
16.5%

Industrials

8.3%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.4%

Energy

3.6%
6.1%

Utilities

2.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.8%

Technology

ADME
35.2%
WTMF
17.0%

Financial Services

ADME
11.9%
WTMF
15.8%

Communication Services

ADME
11.3%
WTMF
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ADME
10.2%
WTMF
8.4%

Healthcare

ADME
8.4%
WTMF
16.5%

Industrials

ADME
8.3%
WTMF
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

ADME
5.0%
WTMF
2.4%

Energy

ADME
3.6%
WTMF
6.1%

Utilities

ADME
2.3%
WTMF
2.9%

Real Estate

ADME
2.0%
WTMF
6.1%

Basic Materials

ADME
1.7%
WTMF
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADME vs. WTMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. WTMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMEWTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.51

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

5.61

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

25.08

-12.85

ADME vs. WTMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the WTMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and WTMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMEWTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.62

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.66

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.15

+0.48

Drawdowns

ADME vs. WTMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum WTMF drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and WTMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMEWTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-30.79%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-4.04%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-9.93%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-13.21%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.13%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-17.71%

+9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.90%

+0.81%

Volatility

ADME vs. WTMF - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) at 1.61%. This indicates that ADME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMEWTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

1.61%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

6.84%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

8.63%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

9.46%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

8.07%

+6.33%

ADME vs. WTMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than WTMF's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADME vs. WTMF - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than WTMF's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.37%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADME and WTMF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADME has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs WTMF's -30.79%.

On 5-year performance, ADME leads with 8.23% vs 6.17% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.

ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.65% for WTMF.

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADME and WTMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer