ADME vs. OSCV
ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. ADME is passively managed, while OSCV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ADME returned 8.23%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for OSCV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
ADME vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 8.34% return.
ADME
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
OSCV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ADME vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 9.81% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 20.24% | 18.21% | 9.31% | -18.77% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 8.34% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 10.14% | -11.41% | 27.69% | 4.94% | 27.51% | -13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADME and OSCV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ADME and OSCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
ADME vs. OSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ADME
OSCV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ADME
OSCV
Financial Services
ADME
OSCV
Communication Services
ADME
OSCV
-
Consumer Cyclical
ADME
OSCV
Healthcare
ADME
OSCV
Industrials
ADME
OSCV
Consumer Defensive
ADME
OSCV
Energy
ADME
OSCV
Utilities
ADME
OSCV
Real Estate
ADME
OSCV
Basic Materials
ADME
OSCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADME vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank
ADME
OSCV
ADME vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADME | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.81 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 5.34 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADME | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.03 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.30 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.36 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ADME vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and OSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADME | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -42.40% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -7.55% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -22.92% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | -22.92% | -0.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -3.46% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -7.60% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.55% | -0.84% |
Volatility
ADME vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is 2.99%, while Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ADME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADME | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.47% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 9.45% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 13.37% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 17.26% | -4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 20.91% | -6.51% |
ADME vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ADME and OSCV have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
ADME vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison
ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than OSCV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADME and OSCV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSCV has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to ADME (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs OSCV's -42.40%.
On 5-year performance, ADME leads with 8.23% vs 5.11% for OSCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ADME has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ADME and OSCV have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.
ADME is categorized as Hedge Fund, while OSCV is Small Cap Blend Equities.
ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADME and OSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer