PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADME vs. IDME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADME vs. IDME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than IDME's 16.05% return.


ADME

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.93%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

IDME

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.97%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.64%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADME vs. IDME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
9.81%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%5.86%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
16.05%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and IDME is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.68

The correlation between ADME and IDME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADME vs. IDME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADME
IDME

Technology

35.2%
9.9%

Financial Services

11.9%
19.2%

Communication Services

11.3%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.6%

Industrials

8.3%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
8.4%

Energy

3.6%
5.6%

Utilities

2.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.1%

Technology

ADME
35.2%
IDME
9.9%

Financial Services

ADME
11.9%
IDME
19.2%

Communication Services

ADME
11.3%
IDME
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ADME
10.2%
IDME
11.1%

Healthcare

ADME
8.4%
IDME
9.6%

Industrials

ADME
8.3%
IDME
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

ADME
5.0%
IDME
8.4%

Energy

ADME
3.6%
IDME
5.6%

Utilities

ADME
2.3%
IDME
3.0%

Real Estate

ADME
2.0%
IDME
3.2%

Basic Materials

ADME
1.7%
IDME
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADME vs. IDME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. IDME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMEIDMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.98

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

11.87

+0.36

ADME vs. IDME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the IDME Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and IDME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMEIDMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.21

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.44

+0.18

Drawdowns

ADME vs. IDME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum IDME drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and IDME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMEIDMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-29.20%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-11.46%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-12.88%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.99%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-11.17%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.87%

-1.16%

Volatility

ADME vs. IDME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is 2.99%, while Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that ADME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMEIDMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

5.23%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

12.95%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

15.48%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

14.64%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.64%

-0.24%

ADME vs. IDME - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IDME's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADME vs. IDME - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than IDME's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.37%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.98%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADME and IDME have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to ADME (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs IDME's -29.20%.

On 3-year performance, IDME leads with 18.02% vs 17.40% for ADME. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ADME has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDME has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 17.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.

ADME is categorized as Hedge Fund, while IDME is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.65% for IDME.

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADME and IDME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer