PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADME vs. DRSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADME vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADME vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
-3.52%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-17.42%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
-3.23%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than DRSK's -3.23% return.


ADME

1D
2.21%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

DRSK

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-3.23%
6M
-3.42%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADME vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADME and DRSK have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

ADME vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMEDRSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.50

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.80

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.51

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.54

1.39

+4.15

ADME vs. DRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the DRSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and DRSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMEDRSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.50

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.24

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and DRSK is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ADME vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than DRSK's 3.89% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.42%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.89%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ADME vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than DRSK's maximum drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and DRSK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMEDRSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-19.87%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-7.20%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-19.87%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-6.28%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-4.26%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.63%

-0.44%

Volatility

ADME vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) at 1.74%. This indicates that ADME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADMEDRSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

1.74%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

5.46%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

8.09%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

7.22%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

7.00%

+7.45%