PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADCT vs. EPRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADCT vs. EPRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT) and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADCT achieves a -63.46% return, which is significantly lower than EPRT's 7.32% return.


ADCT

1D
-0.77%
1M
22.86%
6M
-64.75%
YTD
-63.46%
1Y
-59.05%
3Y*
-11.32%
5Y*
-44.48%
10Y*

EPRT

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.04%
6M
8.01%
YTD
7.32%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADCT vs. EPRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics SA
-63.46%77.39%19.88%-56.77%-80.99%-36.89%6.70%
EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
7.32%-1.40%27.32%14.20%-14.60%41.19%88.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ADCT and EPRT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.15

The correlation between ADCT and EPRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADCT:

$164.08M

EPRT:

$6.74B

EPS

ADCT:

-$0.93

EPRT:

$1.26

PS Ratio

ADCT:

2.39

EPRT:

10.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADCT:

$79.18M

EPRT:

$591.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADCT:

$71.82M

EPRT:

$502.46M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADCT:

-$87.83M

EPRT:

$476.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADCT vs. EPRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADCT
ADCT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ADCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADCT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ADCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADCT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

EPRT
EPRT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EPRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADCT vs. EPRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT) and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADCTEPRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.05

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

0.30

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.10

0.67

-2.77

ADCT vs. EPRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the EPRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADCT and EPRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADCT vs. EPRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADCT drawdown since its inception was -99.08%, which is greater than EPRT's maximum drawdown of -73.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADCT and EPRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADCTEPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.08%

-73.67%

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.97%

-14.26%

-65.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.52%

-20.31%

-61.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.51%

-38.42%

-60.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.47%

-7.98%

-89.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.62%

-13.90%

-63.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.03%

6.42%

+22.61%

Volatility

ADCT vs. EPRT - Volatility Comparison

ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT) has a higher volatility of 21.29% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) at 7.12%. This indicates that ADCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADCTEPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.29%

7.12%

+14.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.85%

14.01%

+84.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.94%

18.36%

+72.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.81%

22.69%

+78.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.95%

38.40%

+56.55%

Dividends

ADCT vs. EPRT - Dividend Comparison

ADCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics SA
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
3.98%4.06%3.71%4.38%4.58%3.47%4.39%3.55%1.62%

Financials

ADCT vs. EPRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADC Therapeutics SA and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.85M
158.80M
(ADCT) Total Revenue
(EPRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADCT and EPRT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADCT has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to EPRT (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADCT dropped -99.08% vs EPRT's -73.67%.

EPRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADCT and EPRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer