ADBG vs. AMDG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ADBG returned -71.70% vs 855.10% for AMDG. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ADBG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADBG achieves a -54.70% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 258.39% return.

ADBG

• 1D: -5.32%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -54.70%
• 6M: -54.25%
• 1Y: -71.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDG

• 1D: -21.69%
• 1M: 15.58%
• YTD: 258.39%
• 6M: 240.36%
• 1Y: 855.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADBG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-54.70%	-30.89%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	258.39%	176.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ADBG and AMDG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.04

The correlation between ADBG and AMDG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ADBG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADBG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADBG	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	6.56	-7.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.98	4.18	-6.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.56	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	15.29	-16.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	29.88	-31.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADBG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADBG Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 6.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADBG and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADBG	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.07	6.56	-7.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.93	2.45	-3.38

Drawdowns

ADBG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADBG drawdown since its inception was -76.71%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBG and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADBG	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.71%	-63.04%	-13.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.23%	-56.48%	-19.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.49%	-27.01%	-45.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-25.65%	-16.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.52%	28.85%	+21.67%

Volatility

ADBG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) is 27.94%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 44.53%. This indicates that ADBG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADBG	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.94%	44.53%	-16.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.40%	98.53%	-42.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.29%	131.87%	-64.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.90%	131.49%	-64.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.90%	131.49%	-64.59%

ADBG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADBG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ADBG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	3.13%	11.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADBG and AMDG in my portfolio?

ADBG and AMDG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADBG or AMDG?

AMDG has higher volatility (44.53%) compared to ADBG (27.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBG dropped -76.71% vs AMDG's -63.04%.

Which ETF is better, ADBG or AMDG?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 855.10% vs -71.70% for ADBG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ADBG has been the lower-risk option at 27.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADBG or AMDG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 855.10% return vs -71.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADBG or AMDG?

ADBG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADBG or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.