ADBE vs. LULU
ADBE (Adobe Inc) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. ADBE operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ADBE returned 7.72%/yr vs 5.37%/yr for LULU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADBE vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ADBE having a -41.71% return and LULU slightly lower at -42.85%. Over the past 10 years, ADBE has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 7.72%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 5.37% annualized return.
ADBE
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- YTD
- -41.71%
- 6M
- -42.76%
- 1Y
- -47.91%
- 3Y*
- -24.76%
- 5Y*
- -17.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -50.33%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
ADBE vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBE Adobe Inc | -41.71% | -21.29% | -25.46% | 77.28% | -40.65% | 13.38% | 51.64% | 45.78% | 29.10% | 70.22% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADBE and LULU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.42 |
The correlation between ADBE and LULU shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ADBE:
$82.02B
LULU:
$13.72B
ADBE:
$17.42
LULU:
$12.35
ADBE:
11.71
LULU:
9.62
ADBE:
0.83
LULU:
0.47
ADBE:
3.36
LULU:
1.25
ADBE:
7.12
LULU:
2.73
ADBE:
$25.20B
LULU:
$11.20B
ADBE:
$22.46B
LULU:
$6.24B
ADBE:
$9.68B
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADBE vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
ADBE
LULU
ADBE vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adobe Inc (ADBE) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADBE | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.03 | -0.97 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | -1.72 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADBE vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADBE drawdown since its inception was -79.89%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBE and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADBE | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | -92.26% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.21% | -53.88% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.86% | -77.66% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.36% | -77.66% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.36% | -77.66% | +7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -76.77% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -27.61% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.31% | 30.26% | -2.95% |
Volatility
ADBE vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Adobe Inc (ADBE) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 13.47%. This indicates that ADBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADBE | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 13.47% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.17% | 32.76% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.08% | 44.48% | -9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 42.22% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 40.62% | -6.14% |
Dividends
ADBE vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither ADBE nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ADBE vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adobe Inc and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADBE vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
ADBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
ADBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
ADBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADBE and LULU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADBE has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to LULU (13.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBE dropped -79.89% vs LULU's -92.26%.
LULU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.17 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADBE and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer