PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAM vs. PBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADAM vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAM achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -9.74% return.


ADAM

1D
-2.87%
1M
1.03%
YTD
24.36%
6M
23.09%
1Y
52.21%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
2.03%

PBDC

1D
-2.15%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-9.74%
6M
-10.38%
1Y
-10.30%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADAM vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
24.36%36.49%-19.27%-5.45%13.42%
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-9.74%-1.77%19.43%30.52%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ADAM and PBDC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2022

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAM vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAM
ADAM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ADAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAM vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADAMPBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.92

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

-0.51

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

-0.94

+10.66

ADAM vs. PBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the PBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADAM and PBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADAMPBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

-0.56

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.73

-0.82

Drawdowns

ADAM vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAM drawdown since its inception was -97.94%, which is greater than PBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAM and PBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMPBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.94%

-20.47%

-77.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-20.15%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.20%

-20.47%

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.02%

-17.21%

-53.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.68%

-4.66%

-69.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

10.95%

-5.56%

Volatility

ADAM vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison

Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) at 5.13%. This indicates that ADAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADAMPBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

5.13%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.28%

15.03%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.76%

18.31%

+13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.62%

17.04%

+17.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.27%

17.04%

+31.23%

Dividends

ADAM vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

ADAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.13%, less than PBDC's 11.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
10.13%11.78%13.20%14.07%15.62%10.75%6.10%12.84%13.58%12.97%14.55%19.14%
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.69%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADAM and PBDC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADAM has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to PBDC (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADAM dropped -97.94% vs PBDC's -20.47%.

ADAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADAM and PBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer