PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACYN vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACYN vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACYN

1D
0.39%
1M
0.85%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
-5.75%
1M
108.38%
YTD
336.58%
6M
222.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACYN vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACYN and ARMW is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACYN vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACYN vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACYNARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.75

4.33

-1.58

Drawdowns

ACYN vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYN drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYN and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACYNARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-48.47%

+46.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.75%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-26.42%

+26.14%

Volatility

ACYN vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACYNARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.88%

88.57%

-81.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.88%

88.57%

-81.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

88.57%

-81.69%

ACYN vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACYN vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

ACYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than ARMW's 16.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACYN and ARMW have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACYN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACYN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 1.76% for ACYN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYN and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACYN and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer