ACWV vs. SOXX
ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD), while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWV returned 7.36%/yr vs 35.79%/yr for SOXX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
ACWV vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.79% annualized return.
ACWV
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
ACWV vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.36% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | -1.42% | 18.57% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWV and SOXX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACWV and SOXX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ACWV vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWV
SOXX
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ACWV
SOXX
Healthcare
ACWV
SOXX
-
Financial Services
ACWV
SOXX
-
Communication Services
ACWV
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
ACWV
SOXX
-
Industrials
ACWV
SOXX
-
Utilities
ACWV
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACWV
SOXX
-
Energy
ACWV
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
ACWV
SOXX
-
Real Estate
ACWV
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWV vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
ACWV
SOXX
ACWV vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWV | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.74 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 12.13 | -11.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 46.43 | -44.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWV | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 5.61 | -4.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.96 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 1.07 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.45 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ACWV vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWV | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -70.21% | +41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -15.77% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.56% | -41.36% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -45.75% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | -45.75% | +16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | 0.00% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -19.97% | +16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 4.11% | -2.08% |
Volatility
ACWV vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 1.79%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWV | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 14.03% | -12.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.54% | 27.35% | -21.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 34.18% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 36.11% | -25.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 33.43% | -21.13% |
ACWV vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWV vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWV and SOXX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to ACWV (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWV dropped -28.82% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.79% vs 7.36% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.79% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.
ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
ACWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ACWV tracks MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD), while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWV and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer