ACWV vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ACWV is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

ACWV vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACWV

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 3.64%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 6.99%

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	-0.18%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

ACWV vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWV	PJBF
Technology	25.8%	40.0%
Financial Services	13.2%	2.5%
Healthcare	13.0%	11.5%
Communication Services	11.9%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	2.3%
Industrials	8.1%	16.5%
Utilities	7.3%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	13.8%
Energy	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

ACWV vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 25
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWV	PJBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	—	—

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWV	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	0.00%	-28.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	0.00%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	0.00%	-3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACWV	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	0.00%	+8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	0.00%	+10.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.29%	0.00%	+12.29%

ACWV vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWV vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.94%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ACWV or PJBF?

On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWV or PJBF?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWV or PJBF?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between ACWV and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.59% for PJBF.