ACWV vs. MWEBX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and MFS Global Equity Fund (MWEBX).
ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. MWEBX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 28, 1986.
Performance
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 0.65% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | -1.42% | 18.57% |
MWEBX MFS Global Equity Fund | -8.34% | 12.70% | 22.16% | 13.48% | -18.53% | 16.15% | 13.03% | 29.23% | -10.51% | 22.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than MWEBX's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed MWEBX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while MWEBX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.55% annualized return.
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
MWEBX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -7.33%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MWEBX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACWV vs. MWEBX — Risk / Return Rank
ACWV
MWEBX
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and MFS Global Equity Fund (MWEBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWV | MWEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.14 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 0.30 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.04 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.14 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 0.52 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWV | MWEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.14 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.32 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.51 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWV and MWEBX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Dividend Comparison
ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than MWEBX's 26.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
MWEBX MFS Global Equity Fund | 26.33% | 24.13% | 28.50% | 8.83% | 9.68% | 5.33% | 2.09% | 1.46% | 5.42% | 2.16% | 0.85% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum MWEBX drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and MWEBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWV | MWEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -52.31% | +23.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -13.43% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -28.70% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | -33.91% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -10.81% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -7.90% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 3.52% | -1.76% |
Volatility
ACWV vs. MWEBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 3.16%, while MFS Global Equity Fund (MWEBX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWEBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACWV | MWEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 5.40% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 9.06% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 15.45% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 16.94% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 17.12% | -4.81% |