ACWV vs. IUSN.DE
ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWV returned 5.46%/yr vs 6.97%/yr for IUSN.DE. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IUSN.DE.
Performance
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACWV is traded in USD, while IUSN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IUSN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than IUSN.DE's 14.28% return.
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.88% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | 0.01% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.28% | 21.65% | 6.69% | 16.70% | -18.51% | 15.41% | 15.53% | 26.44% | -13.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWV and IUSN.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ACWV and IUSN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACWV
IUSN.DE
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWV | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.47 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 12.38 | -10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum IUSN.DE drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and IUSN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWV | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -41.11% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -9.02% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.56% | -21.08% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -30.69% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | 0.00% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -8.90% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.54% | -0.44% |
Volatility
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 2.18%, while iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWV | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 4.54% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.63% | 10.99% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 14.87% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 18.28% | -8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 19.60% | -7.30% |
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWV vs. IUSN.DE - Dividend Comparison
ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IUSN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWV and IUSN.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
ACWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUSN.DE is Global Equities. ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACWV and IUSN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer