PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWV vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than FSUVX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


ACWV

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.36%
6M
2.56%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
7.36%

FSUVX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.37%
YTD
6.23%
6M
6.34%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
2.36%11.04%11.38%8.23%-10.36%13.97%3.04%21.04%-1.42%18.57%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
6.23%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%1.35%17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and FSUVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2015

0.89

The correlation between ACWV and FSUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWV vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWVFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.90

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

8.05

-5.68

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWV and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWVFSUVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.65

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.76

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.76

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum FSUVX drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWVFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-32.41%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

-7.28%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-11.55%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-19.48%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

-32.41%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-0.16%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.28%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.72%

+0.31%

Volatility

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 1.79%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWVFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.90%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.54%

6.17%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

8.39%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

12.96%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

15.18%

-2.88%

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ACWV vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FSUVX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
2.04%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.19%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWV and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSUVX has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to ACWV (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWV dropped -28.82% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FSUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWV and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer