ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L
ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 21.70%/yr for ANXU.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.
Performance
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 12.61%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.70% annualized return.
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 11.52% | 22.66% | 17.03% | 21.98% | -18.69% | 19.16% | 16.15% | 26.85% | -10.03% | 23.31% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.83% | 47.17% | 40.88% | -1.76% | 32.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWU.L and ANXU.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, ACWU.L and ANXU.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Financial Services
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Industrials
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Communication Services
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Healthcare
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Defensive
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Energy
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Basic Materials
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Utilities
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Real Estate
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWU.L
ANXU.L
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWU.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.66 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 13.14 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWU.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.54 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.19 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and ANXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWU.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -35.13% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -11.01% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | -22.45% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -35.13% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -35.13% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.77% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -5.77% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.08% | -0.96% |
Volatility
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) is 3.88%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that ACWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWU.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 5.03% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 11.93% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 15.91% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 20.79% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 21.15% | +0.30% |
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWU.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWU.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWU.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and ANXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer