PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than 500U.L's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 12.61%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return.


ACWU.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.86%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.61%

500U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.24%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
11.52%22.66%17.03%21.98%-18.69%19.16%16.15%26.85%-10.03%23.31%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.41%17.98%24.83%26.85%-19.06%30.19%18.05%32.02%-5.58%21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWU.L and 500U.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.51

Over the past year, ACWU.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWU.L
500U.L

Technology

29.3%
35.6%

Financial Services

16.2%
11.8%

Industrials

10.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

ACWU.L
29.3%
500U.L
35.6%

Financial Services

ACWU.L
16.2%
500U.L
11.8%

Industrials

ACWU.L
10.9%
500U.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWU.L
9.3%
500U.L
10.1%

Communication Services

ACWU.L
9.0%
500U.L
11.2%

Healthcare

ACWU.L
8.1%
500U.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

ACWU.L
5.0%
500U.L
4.9%

Energy

ACWU.L
4.2%
500U.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

ACWU.L
3.7%
500U.L
1.8%

Utilities

ACWU.L
2.6%
500U.L
2.4%

Real Estate

ACWU.L
1.8%
500U.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWU.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.34

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

14.61

-1.26

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWU.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWU.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.41

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.88

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

1.12

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.23

-0.33

Drawdowns

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, roughly equal to the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and 500U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWU.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-34.04%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.34%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

-18.29%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-24.22%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-34.04%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.51%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-4.73%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.91%

+0.21%

Volatility

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that ACWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWU.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.21%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

8.54%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

11.57%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

15.79%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.26%

+3.19%

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWU.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ACWU.L and 500U.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.

ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer