ACWU.L vs. 500U.L
ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than 500U.L's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 12.61%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return.
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 11.52% | 22.66% | 17.03% | 21.98% | -18.69% | 19.16% | 16.15% | 26.85% | -10.03% | 23.31% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWU.L and 500U.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, ACWU.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWU.L
500U.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWU.L
500U.L
Financial Services
ACWU.L
500U.L
Industrials
ACWU.L
500U.L
Consumer Cyclical
ACWU.L
500U.L
Communication Services
ACWU.L
500U.L
Healthcare
ACWU.L
500U.L
Consumer Defensive
ACWU.L
500U.L
Energy
ACWU.L
500U.L
Basic Materials
ACWU.L
500U.L
Utilities
ACWU.L
500U.L
Real Estate
ACWU.L
500U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWU.L
500U.L
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.34 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 14.61 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.41 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 1.12 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, roughly equal to the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -34.04% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -8.34% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | -18.29% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -24.22% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -34.04% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.51% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -4.73% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.91% | +0.21% |
Volatility
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that ACWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.21% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 8.54% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 11.57% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 15.79% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 18.26% | +3.19% |
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWU.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ACWU.L and 500U.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer